Kirjallisuus ja viitteet

  1. Beauchamp, G and Parkinson, J (2005): Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard. School Science Review, March 2005, 86(316), pp 97-103.
  2. Becta (2009): Harnessing Technology Schools Survey July 2009, Analysis report. Peter Rudd et al., National Foundation for Educational Research. Tutkimusraportti saatavilla Bectan sivuilta.
  3. ImpaCT2 – Pupils’ and Teachers’ perceptions of ICT in the Home, School and Community (DfES/0742/2002, Becta 2002). Bridget Somekh et al., Becta.
  4. ImpaCT2 – Pupils’ and Teachers’ perceptions of ICT in the Home, School and Community. SUMMARY (The Impact of information and Communication Technologies on Pupil Learning and Attainment). Becta: Coventry, 2002.
  5. Becta (2005): How can the use of an interactive whiteboard enhance the nature of teaching and learning in secondary mathematics and modern foreign languages? ICT Research Bursaries. Tutkimusraportti saatavilla osoitteesta
  6. Becta ICT Advice. Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard – a guide for secondary schools [Becta 2004], 01/2003-04/a/NP/10k.
  7. Becta (2008): Harnessing Technology schools survey : executive summary, Paula Smith et al., National Foundation for Educational Research, September 2008. Tutkimusraportti saatavilla Bectan sivuilta.
  8. Becta (2003): What the research says about interactive whiteboards. Becta ICT Research. Saatavilla osoitteesta Bectan sivuilta.
  9. Becta (2007): Learning in the 21st century – The Case for Harnessing Technology, 09/DD07-08/73/MP/1K.
  10. Beeland, William D, Jr (2002): Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help?,
  11. Bell, Dr. Mary Ann, Why Use an Interactive Whiteboard? A Baker’s Dozen Reasons. Lainattu Teachers.Net Gazettesta.
  12. Butt, Sarah and Cebulla Andreas (2006): E-Maturity and School Performance: A Secondary Analysis of COL Evaluation Data.
  13. Cogill, Julie (2002): How Is The Interactive Whiteboard Being Used In The Primary School And How Does This Affect Teachers And Teaching?
  14. Deaney, R (a), Chapman, A (b) and Hennessy, S (a); (a) University of Cambridge, Faculty of Education, (b) Institute of Education, University of London: A case-study of one teacher’s use of an interactive whiteboard system to support knowledge co-construction in the history classroom. The Curriculum Journal, Vol.20, No.4, December 2009, pp. 365-387.
  15. Futurelab (2007): Interactive whiteboards in the classroom, Tim Rudd, Senior Researcher, Futurelab. Saatavilla Futurelabin sivuilta.
  16. Glover, D. and Miller D (2001): Keele University, United Kingdom, Running with Technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, Vol.10, No.3, 2001.
  17. Glover, D. and Miller D (2005): Keele University, United Kingdom, The interactive Whiteboard: a literature survey, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 14, No.2, 2005.
  18. Hall, I and Higgins, S (2005): Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.2005. Journal of Computer Assisted learning 21, pp. 102-17.
  19. Higgins, Steve 9(a), Beauchamp, Gary (b), and Miller, Dave (c) (2007): Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards, (a) University of Durham, UK, (b) Swansea Institute of Higher Education, UK,(c) Keele University, UK. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 32, No.3, September 2007, pp. 213-225.
  20. Kennewell, S and Beauchamp, G, Swansea School of Education, UK. The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning, Learning, Media and Technology, Vol.32, No.3, September2007, pp. 227-241.
  21. Kennewell, S (a) and Higgins S (b); (a) Swansea Institute of Higher Education, UK; (b) Durham University, UK; Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 32 No.3, September 2007, pp. 207-212.
  22. Kennewell, S and Morgan, A, Department of Education, University of Wales, Swansea, Student Teachers’ Experiences and Attitudes Towards Using Interactive Whiteboards in the Teaching and Learning of Young Children. Copyright @ 2003, Australian Computer Society, Inc. This paper was presented at the IFIP Working Groups 3.5 Conference: Young Children and Learning Technologies, held at UWS Parramatta in July 2003.
  23. Levy, P (2002) Interactive Whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Department of Information Studies (DIS), University of Sheffield. Raportti perustuu Clara Crehanin ja Chrispin Hamooyan Sheffieldin yliopiston tietojenkäsittelyopin laitoksessa vuosina 2000–2001 tekemään opinnäytetyön tutkimukseen.
  24. Moseley, D.V. Higgins, Steve. Bramald, R and Hardman, F. (1999) Ways Forward with ICT: Effective Pedagogy using Information and Communication Technology for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools. Luettu 27.5.2010.
  25. Moss, Dr. Gemma and Jewitt, Dr. Carey et al (2007): The Interactive Whiteboards, Pedagogy and Pupil Performance Evaluation: An Evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge Institute of Education. ISBN 978 1 844788521.S
  26. Smith, F, Hardman, F and Higgins, S (2005): University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies,British Educational Research Journal, Vol.32, No.3 June 2006, pp. 443-457.
  27. Smith, Heather J, Higgins, S, Wall, K and Miller, J, Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education Communication and Language Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Available at: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2005 – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 21, pp. 91 101.
  28. Smith, H (a) and Higgins, S (b), (a) University of Newcastle, UK, (b) University of Durham, UK, Opening classroom interaction: the importance of feedback. Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol.36, No.4, December 2006, pp. 485-502.
  29. Somekh, Bridget et al (2007) Evaluation of the ICT Testbed Project. Manchester Metropolitan University and Nottingham Trent University. Luettu 27.5.2010.
  30. Thomas, M (a) and Cutrim Schmid, E (b); (a) Nagoya University of Commerce & Business, Japan, (b)University of Education, Heidelberg, Germany; (2010) Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice. Information Science Reference, IGI Global ISBN: 978-1-61520-715-2 (Hardcover).
  31. Wall, K, Higgins, S and Smith, H: The visual helps me understand the complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.36, No.5 2005, pp. 851-867.